The Reliability of Red Flags

In Spinal Cord Compression

The Reliability of Red Flags


Acute low back pain is a common cause for presentation to the emergency department (ED). Since benign etiologies account for 95% of cases, red flags are used to identify sinister causes that require prompt management. They assessed the effectiveness of red flag signs used in the ED to identify spinal cord and cauda equine compression. It was a retrospective cohort study of 206 patients with acute back pain admitted from the ED. The presence or absence of the red flag symptoms was assessed against evidence of spinal cord or cauda equina compression on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Overall, 32 (15.5%) patients had compression on MRI. Profound lower limb neurologic examination did not demonstrate a statistically significant association with this finding. The likelihood ratio (LR) for bowel and bladder dysfunction (sensitivity of 0.65 and specificity of 0.73) was 2.45. Saddle sensory disturbance (sensitivity of 0.27 and specificity of 0.87) had a LR of 2.11. When both symptoms were taken together (sensitivity of 0.27 and specificity of 0.92), they gave a LR of 3.46.


Conclusions demonstrated that the predictive value of the two statistically significant red flags only marginally raises the clinical suspicion of spinal cord or cauda equina compression. Effective risk stratification of patients presenting to the ED with acute back pain is crucial; however, this study did not support the use of these red flags in their current form.

  • Bartholomeeusen S, Van Zundert J, Truyers C, Buntinx F, Paulus D. Higher incidence of common diagnoses in patients with low back pain in primary care. Pain Pract. 2012;12(1):1-6. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • Palmer KT, Walsh K, Bendall H, Cooper C, Coggon D. Back pain in Britain: comparison of two prevalence surveys at an interval of 10 years. BMJ. 2000;320(7249):1577-8. [PubMed]
  • Jarvik JG, Deyo RA. Diagnostic evaluation of low back pain with emphasis on imaging. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137(7):586-97. [PubMed]
  • Ma B, Wu H, Jia LS, Yuan W, Shi GD, Shi JG. Cauda equina syndrome: a review of clinical progress. Chin Med J (Engl). 2009;122(10):1214-22. [PubMed]
  • McKinley WO, Seel RT, Hardman JT. Nontraumatic spinal cord injury: incidence, epidemiology, and functional outcome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80(6):619-23. [PubMed]
  • Balasubramanian K, Kalsi P, Greenough CG, Kuskoor Seetharam MP. Reliability of clinical assessment in diagnosing cauda equina syndrome. Br J Neurosurg. 2010;24(4):383-6. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • Crocker M, Fraser G, Boyd E, Wilson J, Chitnavis BP, Thomas NW. The value of interhospital transfer and emergency MRI for suspected cauda equina syndrome: a 2-year retrospective study. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2008;90(6):513-6. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • Ahn UM, Ahn NU, Buchowski JM, Garrett ES, Sieber AN, Kostuik JP. Cauda equina syndrome secondary to lumbar disc herniation: a meta-analysis of surgical outcomes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25(12):1515-22. [PubMed]
  • Dunn KM, Croft PR. Epidemiology and natural history of low back pain. Eura Medicophys. 2004;40(1):9-13. [PubMed]
  • Goldberg AL, Kershah SM. Advances in imaging of vertebral and spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2010;33(2):105-16. [PubMed]
  • Siemionow K, Steinmetz M, Bell G, Ilaslan H, McLain RF. Identifying serious causes of back pain: cancer, infection, fracture. Cleve Clin J Med. 2008;75(8):557-66. [PubMed]
  • Andersen JC. Is immediate imaging important in managing low back pain? J Athl Train. 2011;46(1):99-102. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • Gilbert FJ, Grant AM, Gillan MG, Vale LD, Campbell MK, Scott NW, et al. Low back pain: influence of early MR imaging or CT on treatment and outcome–multicenter randomized trial. Radiology. 2004;231(2):343-51. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • Lurie JD, Birkmeyer NJ, Weinstein JN. Rates of advanced spinal imaging and spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003;28(6):616-20. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • Arnau JM, Vallano A, Lopez A, Pellise F, Delgado MJ, Prat N. A critical review of guidelines for low back pain treatment. Eur Spine J. 2006;15(5):543-53. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • van Tulder M, Becker A, Bekkering T, Breen A, del Real MT, Hutchinson A, et al. Chapter 3. European guidelines for the management of acute nonspecific low back pain in primary care. Eur Spine J. 2006;15 Suppl 2:S169-91. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • Henschke N, Maher CG, Refshauge KM, Herbert RD, Cumming RG, Bleasel J, et al. Prevalence of and screening for serious spinal pathology in patients presenting to primary care settings with acute low back pain. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;60(10):3072-80. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • Mahowald ML, Singh JA, Majeski P. Opioid use by patients in an orthopedics spine clinic. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52(1):312-21. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • Deyo RA, Rainville J, Kent DL. What can the history and physical examination tell us about low back pain? JAMA. 1992;268(6):760-5. [PubMed]
  • Nitta H, Tajima T, Sugiyama H, Moriyama A. Study on dermatomes by means of selective lumbar spinal nerve block. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993;18(13):1782-6. [PubMed]
  • Resnick DK. Neuroscience education of undergraduate medical students. Part I: role of neurosurgeons as educators. J Neurosurg. 2000;92(4):637-41. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • Glick TH, Workman TP, Gaufberg SV. Spinal cord emergencies: false reassurance from reflexes. Acad Emerg Med. 1998;5(10):1041-3. [PubMed]
Clinical Maze

The Clinical Maze APP is coming soon

The Clinical Maze APP will be made available to all course participants. Check back soon for more updates and information

Coming soon!

We Value Your Feedback

Spread the word, improve our courses or even add another course to the Clinical Maze.

Feedback form

Host Your Own Clinical Maze Course

If you or your organization are interested in hosting a course please click here

Go to form